Deep Learning Indaba 2026 · Lagos · Workshop

Building red-teaming capacity for AI safety evaluation in African contexts

This workshop introduces participants to red-teaming as a practical, hands-on methodology for probing models for harmful, unsafe, or misaligned behaviour, grounded in African languages and real-world use cases.

Format
Interactive workshop
Duration
Three hours
Capacity
Up to 40
Bring
A laptop

§ Schedule

Three hours, four parts.

Part I
Setting the scene
45 min
Part II
The method
45 min
Part III · core
Hands-on exercise
60 min
Part IV
Debrief & next steps
30 min
Understand why Africa-specific evaluation matters.
Can describe the methodology end-to-end.
Have run a red-teaming sequence yourself.

§ The exercise

A guided red-teaming exercise.

In Part III you'll work in small mixed groups (technical and policy researchers together) to apply the methodology to a focused red-teaming exercise. Facilitators circulate to coach the work and push prompt construction.

Bring a laptop. Materials and facilitation guides are provided on the day.

Full exercise details — coming soon

§ Who it's for

Built for a mixed audience.

AI safety & NLP researchers
Working in low-resource or African-language settings.
Policy & social-science researchers
Working on AI governance, harm, or accountability.
Civil society & applied researchers
Evaluating AI tools being deployed in African contexts.
PhD & postdoctoral researchers
Looking for a methodological frame for safety work.

The exercise teaches a method, not how to generate harm.

The exercise is designed to teach red-teaming as an evaluation methodology. The facilitation cards, threat models, and annotated examples are prepared in advance by the organising team and are calibrated to support skill development without requiring participants to generate content that would be distressing to produce or encounter in a group setting.

  1. 01
    Participant information
    The workshop description published in advance states clearly what the exercise involves. Participation is voluntary, and an age requirement of 18 or above applies.
  2. 02
    Written consent
    Participants provide written consent at the start of the session covering participation in the exercise.
  3. 03
    Facilitator oversight
    All facilitators are briefed in advance on the protocol and on the procedures for redirecting group work if needed.
  4. 04
    Data handling
    No personally identifiable information is collected. Prompts are documented without attribution to individuals. Research outputs will not reproduce detailed adversarial prompts verbatim.

§ Speakers & materials

To be announced.

Coming soon

The panel will feature researchers working on AI evaluation, safety, and African language AI.

Full speaker line-up will be confirmed and announced here in the coming weeks. We'll also share pre-reading and workshop materials ahead of the session so participants can arrive prepared.

To be notified when speakers and materials are available, email info@casa-ai.org.

§ Organisers

A joint workshop, CASA & UCT AI Initiative.

Centre for AI Security and Access
SA Sumaya Nur Adan
Sumaya Nur Adan
JW Joanna Wiaterek
Joanna Wiaterek
UCT AI Initiative
JS Prof. Jonathan Shock
Prof. Jonathan Shock
AH Dr. Annette Hübschle
Dr. Annette Hübschle

§ FAQ

Common questions.

§ Support & funding

The UCT AI Initiative's contribution to this work is supported by the Artificial Intelligence for Development (AI4D) Africa programme, with financial support from Canada's International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the UK's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO).

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of IDRC or its Board of Governors, or those of FCDO.